WHY NOT have graphic labels for GMOs showing how GMOs [are actually proven to] CAUSE CANCER, illness, obesity, sterility, death, and NEW health disorders? I have yet to see a single peer-reviewed report of a REAL study proving that smoking tobacco causes cancer... in fact the most dangerous chemicals in cigarettes are ADDED when the plants are watered with the same water WE drink from our taps. The most carcinogenic part of tobacco is actually the fact that the crop is IRRADIATED WITH NUCLEAR RADIATION - but the 'anti-smoking' groups cannot tell you this because all of the lettuce we eat and most of our produce is also irradiated!
FYI your tap water causes cancer (added sodium fluoride, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, lead); so does GMO corn, soy, canola, alfalfa, cottonseed oil; chemotherapy & radiation cause cancer... not to mention your "cars, homes, furniture, carpeting, walls, curtains, blinds, windows, woodwork, air ducts" ALL made out of carcinogenic petrochemical plastics and finishes accounting for 50% of our oil imports...
Dentists say "Smoking yellows teeth, damages the mouth and gums, and chronic bad breath of a smoker, which toothpaste and moughwash repair with fluoride"
but did your dentist mention what CAUSES "DENTAL FLUOROSIS"?
People have smoked tobacco in Africa for hundreds of years - BUT lung cancer was never a problem (hardly even reported) UNTIL the British colonized and industrialized Africa. Occurences of lung cancer came immediately after DEISEL FUEL EXHAUST was introduced into their environment. In fact, the reason WHY there aren't many full-service gas stations left is because the attendants started being commonly diagnosed with lung cancer FROM the DEISEL FUEL EXHAUST.
People smoked in Africa for thousands of years but never got lung cancer until the British industrialized them (full-service gas stations closed because ALL the attendants got lung cancer FROM breathing diesel exhaust)... SMALL PARTICLES CAUSE CANCER (mold, radiation) - smoke is NOT small enough...
Cigarettes "COULD exacerbate"... don't worry it's not depleted uranium, nor mercury fumes from generating electricity by burning fossil fuels, it's not the vaccines nor petrochemical pharmaceuticals, it's not your fluoridated water, nor petrochemical foods causing "NEW allergies" sold by GMO brokers... you've found the culprit... it must be... it has to be... and COULD only be... those damned cigarette smokers...
Hitler's Nazi Anti-Smoking Campaigns
You know who was the first jerk (smoker) to publicly attack smokers? Simply because he didn't like smoke and he wanted them to give up their freedom so he could be selfishly happy... Adolph Hitler hated smokers first; he taught many fools how to bigot and hate their neighbors. Let's pretend for just a minute that the nazi inspired smoker-bashing campaigns (started by Hitler) genuinely care about health - rather than just bigoting people whom they dislike purely based upon their habits and opinions...
After German [rockefeller's ig farben] doctors became the first to identify the *LINK* between smoking and lung cancer, Nazi Germany initiated a strong anti-tobacco movement and led the first public anti-smoking campaign in modern history.
The first modern attempt at restricting smoking was imposed by the then German government in every university, post office, military hospital, and Nazi Party office, under the auspices of Karl Astel's Institute for Tobacco Hazards Research, created in 1941 under orders from Adolf Hitler. Major anti-tobacco campaigns were widely broadcast by the Nazis until the demise of the regime in 1945.
Adolf Hitler was a heavy smoker in his early life (he used to smoke 25 to 40 cigarettes daily) but gave up the habit, concluding that it was a waste of money. Adolf Hitler's personal distaste for tobacco and the Nazi reproductive policies were among the motivating factors behind their campaign against smoking, and this campaign was associated with both antisemitism and racism.
Mandatory FDA Food Irradiation
IF you REALLY wanted to convince someone that smoking tobacco causes cancer... WHY NOT just tell them it contains nuclear radiation? which we know causes cancer... WHY NOT tell people that all tobacco is IRRADIATED?!? BECAUSE all our spinach & lettuce is mandatory irradiated by the FDA... ironically radiation is **SOLD** as 1 of the only 2 rockefeller-patented treatments.
Fake Cancer Donation Centers
Now let's pretend for just a minute that the cancer institutes are really trying to find a cure for a disease that profits them about $50k per patient in the last 5 years while they're murdered with rockefeller-patented chemotherapy... this is their response when presented with a working cure with dozens of terminally-ill patients reversed: "THE [CANADIAN CANCER] SOCIETY DOES NOT ENDORSE OR SUPPORT MEDICAL PRODUCTS OR DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS... THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION. GOOD LUCK IN YOUR WORK."
Scientific Experiments With Control Tests
I've spent hours researching this topic and have never found a single peer-reviewed report of a REAL study proving that smoking tobacco causes cancer. This experiment is as simple as putting rats in 2 separate cages, and blowing smoke into one of them - IF cigarette smoke DOES cause cancer = the rats in the smoke-filled chamber will develop cancerous tumors, while the rats in the control cage would NOT. So after all the money THEY spend telling us that smoking causes cancer - WHY NOT spend $100 on some rats and a pack of smokes to PROVE it? Until THEY do, this is just a load of propaganda to defer the responsibility and cost of the INDUSTRIAL SMOKESTACKS that THEY scrape for sodium fluoride to add to our public water supply (which does indeed cause osteoporosis and bone cancer in boys).
"Research also SUGGESTS that"... how stupid do you think people are?
"Research also SUGGESTS that secondhand smoke MAY increase the RISK" this is what you think is "science"? i call that legalese = a way for lawyers to deceptively manipulate words so naive people cannot differentiate between fact and fiction. "MAY increase the RISK of heart disease", "secondhand smoke is THOUGHT to cause about", "Secondhand smoke is ASSOCIATED with disease and premature death", "There MAY also be a LINK between exposure to secondhand smoke and the RISK of stroke", "CAN cause them to cough", "smoke CAN be harmful", etc...
2 cages of rats, you blow smoke on half of them, which get cancer, and the control rats don't... they can spend a fortune on propaganda, lies, and half-truths... but cannot perform a simple scientific test...
Incase you don't understand what REAL science looks like...
here are the tests showing: Nutrasweet causes cancer, seizures and death!
If anyone knows of or ever finds a REAL PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY proving that smoking tobacco causes cancer, please eMail your sources to firstname.lastname@example.org
Existing Carcinogen Reports on Smoking Tobacco 1992-2010
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking (Also Known as Exposure to Secondhand Smoke or Environmental Tobacco Smoke — ETS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992.
National Cancer Institute. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1999. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 10.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. Lyon, France: 2002. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 83.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer Progress Report 2003. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 2004.
National Toxicology Program. Report on Carcinogens. Eleventh Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, 2005.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant: Part B Health Effects, 2005.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2010.
Unrelated Carcinogenic Associations Rather Than FACTS
"69 chemicals in secondhand smoke" right... cadmium, arsenic, lead, mercury ALL ADDED BY CITIES TO THE TAP WATER used to water the plants... cite one single peer-reviewed study showing that second-hand smoke CAUSES CANCER... We're not dumb enough for you to fool with "i found a chemical in cigarettes that independently tests as a carcinogen but we cannot produce a simple test with rats in 2 cages showing that inhaling smoke causes cancer".